Weinstein Legal professionals Slam #MeToo, Name Jennifer Siebel Newsom a ‘Bimbo’

Harvey Weinstein’s protection informed the jury that there’s completely no proof towards their consumer and that each girl who will testify in his trial is an actress who can be enjoying a task on the stand — all to suit the narrative of #MeToo, which they characterised as an “asteroid” of a motion that “burst forth like a supernova” with Weinstein because the poster baby.

Weinstein’s legal professional Mark Werksman informed jurors that they need to put together to listen to a “firehose of false and unprovable allegations” from ladies who agreed to have consensual sexual interactions with Weinstein, however years later, are actually embarrassed and mendacity about what actually occurred.

“Have a look at my consumer,” Werksman stated, pointing to Weinstein. “He’s not Brad Pitt or George Clooney. Do you suppose these stunning ladies had intercourse with him as a result of he’s scorching? No, it’s as a result of he’s highly effective.”

Weinstein’s legal professional informed the jury that Hollywood has modified at the moment, however again within the day, “transactional intercourse” was par for the course. “Intercourse was a commodity” for “wealthy and highly effective males, like my consumer,” Weinstein’s legal professional stated, even getting its personal nickname: the casting sofa.

“Transactional intercourse … it might have been disagreeable … and now embarrassing,” Werksman stated. “[But] everybody did it. He did it. They did it.”

Weinstein’s legal professional stated the #MeToo motion is sort of a film that turned Weinstein into “Hollywood’s Chernobyl,” casting him within the “smoldering radioactive” a part of the “unhealthy man.”

And the ladies? “The sequel to the casting sofa is the #MeToo trial,” Weinstein’s protection stated. “They’ll play the a part of the damsel in misery with this beast.”

“They must deceive themselves, to you, to this courtroom,” Werksman informed the jury. “Their hypocrisy can be on full show.”

Weinstein’s legal professional urged the jury to make use of their “frequent sense” and notice that there is no such thing as a forensic proof, similar to a police report, rape equipment, DNA, semen pattern or surveillance video of any felony exercise to again up the ladies’s accusations. “Every will boil all the way down to ‘consider me,’” he stated of the victims. “If an accuser waits years, the allegation boils all the way down to her phrase.”

Werksman informed the jury that Weinstein got here from humble beginnings and was not born with a “silver spoon” in his mouth. He labored arduous to create success for himself, his legal professional stated, urging the jurors to not get distracted by the tales of personal jets and celeb events. “With super fame and fortune got here fame of fortune seekers,” his legal professional stated, categorizing the ladies as having “consensual intercourse with Mr. Weinstein as a result of they needed to use their reference to Mr. Weinstein” and having “intercourse in alternate for one thing with worth.”

Weinstein’s legal professional spent a lot of his time throughout opening statements specializing in Jane Doe #4, who was revealed to be Jennifer Siebel Newsom, the actress and director who’s married to California Governor Gavin Newsom, who accused Weinstein of raping her in a resort room in 2005. She has turn into a number one voice towards sexual harassment and assault in recent times.

“She’s made herself a distinguished determine of the #MeToo motion,” Werksman stated, itemizing her present accolades and standing because the First Accomplice of California. However again within the early 2000s when Siebel Newsom was an aspiring actress and filmmaker, Weinstein’s legal professional says she was a “Hollywood wannabe.”

Werksman informed the jury that through the alleged rape in 2005, Siebel Newsom says she faked an orgasm to finish the assault rapidly. Weinstein’s legal professional stated there is no such thing as a extra “enthusiastic sign of consent” than “sure, sure, sure” — which is why, he stated, “Mr. Weinstein believed she consented.”

Weinstein’s legal professional additionally famous that Weinstein was an enormous donor to the Democratic Occasion, and contributed cash to Gavin Newsom all through the years. He famous that in 2007, Weinstein had the couple as friends to one in every of his events, through the time when Newsom was the mayor of San Francisco. “She introduced her husband to satisfy and social gathering along with her rapist. Who does that?” Werksman stated. “He took cash from his spouse’s rapist for his political campaigns.”

Werksman stated if Siebel Newsom didn’t have her present place in politics at the moment, “She’d be simply one other bimbo who slept with Harvey Weinstein to get forward.”

After the prosecutors and Weinstein’s protection gave their opening statements, the prosecution known as their first witness, generally known as Jane Doe #1. The actress, whose first language shouldn’t be English and had a Russian translator along with her as she testified, broke down in tears on the stand, as she detailed the alleged assault that occurred in February 2013 in a resort room through the Los Angeles Italia Movie Competition. She is going to proceed her testimony on Tuesday morning.