Categories: Education

Skill and Politics: The Shrewd Compatibility?

Artwork and politics do not often move along too effectively in every society. While in some political instances, art is considered an instrument for achieving specific community strategies, in other occasions, art is viewed as an opponent of the State (government). This program is for two apparent reasons. The initial reason is that political simply campaigns, rallies, and other identical events make use of art kinds like posters, printing involving t-shirts, banners, bill forums, etc., to achieve the maximum brings into the reality of the set goals of this sort of event. What you need to consider about “We the People 13th Edition pdf”.

In this way, art isn’t just seen as a tool for obtaining political ends but also being a pure friend of state policies because, without it (art), politics would find it challenging to express or connect its interest to the open public (masses) in a manner that would be quickly understood. For example, the images involving political aspirants made available through visual forms like cards and bill-boards bring the participants closer to the people and also stumble through people to know those they can be supported even though such men and women, in most cases, never have the opportunity involving meeting the aspirants one on one before elections.

Given this situation, it is typical for a person, team, or community to identify having a political aspirant (aspiring for gubernatorial, presidential, or senatorial positions) by simply wearing the printed cap or tee shirt, or jersey with the image of the aspirant (in the case of an individual); or mounting a billboard at the entrance of a local community or strategic areas within the capital city or even its metropolis. In this way, the artwork not only provided a favorable link between the people (masses) and those seeking political workplaces but also provided channels through which the aspirants expressed their interest to the public throughout the election season. All these create art as an excellent friend to politics.

The second reason is contrary to the first one mentioned above. This is because when artists create works that do not talk well of the policies of the existing government, political frontrunners consider art a foe. For example, the cartoons in the newspaper dailies or some other periodical publications draw upon critical issues that affect the public, which the government is declining to give attention to. For instance, a toon drawn to ignite or trigger one’s thoughts on the problem of resource control within the Niger Delta will undoubtedly depict leaders as robust and healthy. At the same time, the suffering public would be portrayed in weak and poverty-stricken circumstances. The images would be satirically symbolized to amuse and yet attract attention to an issue of a crucial societal need. Politics leaders at the helm associated with affairs do consider such toons or artworks as a setup to sabotage their authorities or regimes. Instead of thinking about such art forms, visual commentaries should address or correct the ills typically in society by simply formulating, implementing, and actualizing good/workable policies for the benefit of the suffering masses that they view them (such artwork forms) in the other technique round.

Considering the two contrary sides presented above, artwork and politics are irregularly in conflict. This is because, where legitimate art practice thrives, community leaders do not find it easy to operate or cheat the battling masses without art leaky their (politicians’) evil plans/secrets. This is likely why almost all governments or political routines undermine the art market for fear of not being employed against it. Given this, cultural policies that could take a positive turn-around and engender the growth and development of artwork in a nation are sometimes frustrated or given zero attention. This is bad not only for the progress involving art but also for the entire ethnic development of a region. Art is a vital element of culture; if the idea suffers, this region’s culture would also be irrecoverable.