Jeopardy Slammed For Insensitive Gabby Petito-Brian Laundrie Clue: WTF Have been They Pondering?!

Again in the summertime of 2021 the disappearance of Gabby Petito captured the eye of a horrified nation.

One week after her mom reported her lacking, Petito’s stays had been found at a campground in Wyoming.

The approach to life vlogger, who had been touring the nation along with her boyfriend, Brian Laundrie, was simply 22 years previous.

A nationwide manhunt for Laundrie ensued, coming to an finish when the suspect’s skeletal stays had been present in Florida’s Myakkahatchee Creek Environmental Park.

Medical experts decided that Laundrie had died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Police later revealed that they found a written confession to Petito’s homicide amongst Laundrie’s belongings.

Evidently, viral information tales don’t get way more tragic than the unhappy saga of Gabby Petito.

So why did this case grow to be fodder for a surprisingly lighthearted Celeb Jeopardy clue?

Sure, viewers had been stunned this week when the Mayim Bialik-hosted Sunday evening collection casually referenced the horrifying Petit-Laundrie case.

“In 2021, fugitive Brian Laundrie ended his days in Fla’s Myakkahatchee Creek space, house to those lengthy & toothy critters,” learn the clue.

The reply was revealed as “What are alligators?”

For apparent causes, viewers had been appalled by the clue, with many calling it probably the most offensive second within the present’s historical past.

“Not superstar @jeopardy utilizing Brian Laundrie as a clue for alligators.. that’s so distasteful and incorrect might’ve used the rest for a clue,” one individual tweeted, in keeping with Web page Six.

“That is probably the most tasteless and insensitive reply I’ve ever seen on any Jeopardy! What the hell had been they pondering? Making gentle of that tragic scenario is repugnant. Rattling. #CelebrityJeopardy,” one other added.

“THIS, that is past offensive. It’s appalling & utterly insensitive, to not point out completely pointless. Disgrace on, @Jeopardy,” a 3rd chimed in.

Others demanded solutions and wished to understand how many individuals needed to log out on the choice to make use of such an oddly “edgy” clue on the long-running quiz present.

“What within the hell is incorrect with you? Have you ever no soul? I can’t consider this query obtained previous your legal professionals,” one viewer tweeted.

“That is probably the most tasteless and insensitive reply I’ve ever seen on any Jeopardy!” one other fumed, including:

“What the hell had been they pondering? Making gentle of that tragic scenario is repugnant.”

Steve Bertolino, an lawyer for the Laundrie household, revealed that his purchasers had been equally shocked.

“Your entire Laundrie household is appalled and concurs with all the feedback on social media on how distasteful this was. I consider an apology is due,” Bertolino stated in an announcement issued this week.

“For this distasteful Jeopardy query to be posed solely highlights the sensationalism that surrounded this tragedy and places salt on the injuries of a household that has not been afforded any rights or privateness when the household themselves did nothing incorrect,” the lawyer added.

Many identified that it’s not unusual for the present to base clues on real-life prison instances.

However there’s a distinction between quizzing gamers in regards to the exploits of Al Capone and making a grim reference to the latest deaths of two younger individuals.

The phrase “too quickly” was coined for situations like this one, and it’s no shock that Jeopardy followers are shocked.

Over the course of its a long time on the air, the present has confirmed fairly adept at avoiding this type of controversy.

Hopefully, producers will take steps towards making amends someday quickly.