‘Even Ajmal Kasab acquired…’: Satyendar Jain defends viral therapeutic massage video, says no guidelines violated

Delhi Minister Satyendar Jain, who’s presently in jail on expenses of cash laundering, on Tuesday instructed a trial court docket that he has not been getting correct meals and medical check-up in Tihar Jail and has misplaced round 28 kg weight in custody. 

He additionally alleged that the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which is investigating the minister, is leaking delicate info to the media regardless of the order of the court docket and enterprise given on this court docket.

Jain was referring to a video through which he’s seen taking therapeutic massage from an individual contained in the jail.   

“I’m defamed each single minute by their act,” Jain submitted to the court docket by means of his counsel Rahul Mehra.

Mehra additionally denied the claims that Jain was getting privileged remedy in Tihar Jail. 

“I’ve misplaced 28 kg in jail. Is that this what a privileged individual in jail will get? I’m not even getting correct meals. What privilege are they speaking about? No jail guidelines are violated if an undertrial is urgent his hand or toes,” Jain was quoted as saying by the information company ANI.

Mehra additionally submitted that the probe companies have already put Jain on the gallows. He mentioned even Ajmal Kasab acquired a free and truthful trial and Jain was absolutely not worse than him. 

“Even Ajmal Kasab acquired a free and truthful trial. I’m absolutely not worse than that. All I search is a good and free trial. Please have a look at the type of media reviews which are working in opposition to him and that’s of their curiosity,” Mehra submitted to the court docket.

Final week, Jain moved the particular court docket with an software in search of contempt motion in opposition to the ED. He alleged that the central company has leaked the CCTV movies regardless of the enterprise given within the court docket. 

Right this moment, ED’s advocate Zohaib Hossain denied the leak allegations and mentioned that the company will see that responsible are delivered to justice. He mentioned presuming a leak on the company’s behalf is preposterous. He mentioned there was no leak and there shall be no leak by the company.

With inputs from ANI