[ad_1]
Earlier than turning into Twitter’s CEO, proprietor, and “Chief Twit,” Elon Musk had usually lobbed criticism on the platform for its strategy to content material moderation, even going as far as to target the corporate’s former coverage chief Vijaya Gadde. However whereas Musk has expressed his concern about “liberal bias” on the platform, many activists, journalists, and advocates outdoors the US—the place nearly all of Twitter’s customers reside—have begun to fret about how Twitter, now with no board or shareholders and led by a CEO with a number of enterprise entanglements, will reply to authoritarian and authoritarian-leaning governments which have lengthy sought to regulate public opinion.
“How he treats strain from international locations like Saudi Arabia and India—I feel these are key indicators of the place he’s going with the platform,” says David Kaye, former UN particular rapporteur on the suitable to freedom of opinion and expression and medical professor of regulation on the College of California, Irvine.
Whereas Twitter doesn’t boast almost as many customers as Meta-owned Fb or Instagram, it’s extensively utilized by activists, civil society teams, journalists, and politicians—all of whom are influential in shaping public coverage and opinion. The platform has additionally proved essential for these organizing protests in locations like India, Nigeria, and Argentina, and has supplied an avenue for these residing in extremely managed societies like Saudi Arabia to voice criticism of their governments.
Jason Pielemeier, government director of the International Community Initiative, says Musk’s purpose to construct Twitter’s consumer base to greater than a billion folks might additionally have an effect on his willingness to battle it out with overseas governments to maintain content material on the platform.
Though they could not symbolize an enormous share of Twitter’s income stream proper now, international locations like Turkey, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Pakistan, which have very giant, more and more on-line populations, are all enticing markets as the corporate appears to develop its income and enhance its consumer base, in line with Pielemeier. However all of these international locations have had arguments with Twitter particularly or with social media corporations extra broadly, he says. Final 12 months, the Nigerian authorities ordered all Web Service Suppliers (ISPs) to dam Twitter after the platform deleted a tweet from the nation’s president, Muhammadu Buhari, for violating its insurance policies. The federal government lifted the ban solely after Twitter agreed to open an workplace within the nation and pay native taxes.
In India, Twitter’s third largest market, the corporate filed a case earlier this 12 months to contest the federal government’s order to take away particular person items of content material in addition to entire accounts that the federal government considers a danger to India’s safety or sovereignty.
However Raman Jit Singh Chima, senior worldwide counsel and Asia Pacific coverage director at Entry Now, worries that Twitter underneath Musk might not proceed with the lawsuit. (In his August countersuit towards Twitter, Musk cited the lawsuit in India as a menace to the corporate’s presence in its third largest market.) “It will be a vindication of a really problematic, unconstitutional set of actions by the Indian authorities,” he says. “It additionally sends a sign to the worldwide tech business, saying ‘Again off, don’t attempt to do extra.’”
[ad_2]
Source link