Christina Haack Slams Ant Anstead For Sharing Article On Custody Struggle – Hollywood Life

View gallery

Christina Haack took main challenge with a Psychology As we speak article making reference to her custody battle together with her ex-husband Ant Anstead. The fact star, 39, penned a protracted response to the piece on her Instagram, which known as for extra safety for kids on social media and actuality TV, however she additionally known as out her ex, 43, for additionally sharing the article, besides Ant felt the article was rather more optimistic. “It was simply dropped at my consideration Hudson’s father is selling this text on his web page, however with clap palms,” she wrote within the caption. “This makes this much more weird and disturbing.”

When Ant shared the article, he praised the journalist Hilary Levey Friedman Ph.D. for together with his custody battle and highlighting points that the For The Love of Automobiles host took along with his ex-wife utilizing their son Hudson, 3, in paid commercials, and he supported the thought of a “Hudson’s Legislation” to assist shield youngsters on social media and actuality TV. “What an totally good article by [Hilary Levey Friedman] calling for an pressing change within the legislation to guard our youngsters,” he wrote on his Instagram Story.

Whereas Ant supported the concepts that the sociologist and creator introduced up, Christina was very upset and known as the article “fully inaccurate.” She argued that she hadn’t tried to make a case that she and Ant’s son needs to be included in her TV exhibits or paid adverts. “I by no means fought to have Hudson movie with me or put up adverts. I made my level {that a} public determine with a public Instagram ought to take his personal recommendation and depart Hudson off all media if he was involved about Hudson’s security and well-being,” she wrote.

Except for disputing the claims within the article, Christina additionally pointed to different actuality exhibits like Toddlers And Tiaras in addition to influencers together with their youngsters in paid promotional posts. “Are all these individuals placing their youngsters in harms [sic] manner or utilizing their youngsters as ‘puppets?!’ The reply is, NO,” she responded, whereas additionally mentioning that almost all of her exhibits didn’t concentrate on her youngsters, however quite on house enchancment.

Christina in the end clapped again on the thought of a “Hudson’s Legislation,” saying it was pointless. “Go away me out of your propaganda. Hudson’s Legislation?! Actually? That’s absurd. You don’t know something about my family. Hudson is MY son. I’ve at all times protected him and at all times will,” she wrote earlier in her caption.

The previous couple has been concerned in a custody battle concerning their son since April when Ant filed for full custody. Christina responded to a declare from her ex that she was “exploiting” their son in a September courtroom submitting. She mentioned that whereas Hudson had appeared in a few of her adverts, they “had been natural moments in Hudson’s eyes,” however she additionally mentioned that she had no challenge with stopping. She introduced that she’d not characteristic Hudson in an October Instagram put up. “I’ve made the choice to not characteristic Hudson on Instagram, my television exhibits or any social platforms till he’s sufficiently old to make this choice for himself,” she wrote.