Is one among Britain’s greatest asset managers previous restore?

It’s not been a very good yr for the UK asset administration sector — heck, it’s not been good for a number of years. Even so, Abrdn stands out as having some significantly painful issues. They wouldn’t be simple to repair at one of the best of instances. Abrdn’s board is just not having one of the best of instances.

There’s funding efficiency. Outflows. An costly acquisition. A much-mocked rebrand. Issues with the paperwork in a few of its Luxembourg-based funds. Shares which have slipped a lot that 5 years after an £11bn merger, the corporate fails to make the FTSE 100 any extra. Round 9 per cent of its shares bought quick, based on Markit figures. A chief government who appears to have alienated analysts.

That’s earlier than you get to a Sunday Occasions report that the boss doesn’t have the backing of a few of his employees both, an account that Abrdn disputes. The group mentioned in response to the article that “these nameless allegations comprise numerous factual inaccuracies and don’t characterize the truth of the open and clear tradition we’re constructing”.

The defence of Abrdn and CEO Stephen Fowl runs roughly as follows.

Many of the outflows may be traced again to the 2017 tie-up between Normal Life and Aberdeen Asset Administration. These can’t be laid on the door of the previous banker Fowl, in situ for less than two years, and each the deal’s architects at the moment are gone. Fowl is barely halfway via a three-year plan, so it’s too early to evaluate the outcomes — particularly for the £1.5bn acquisition of Interactive Investor, solely accomplished on the finish of Could. Company rejigs and technique overhauls all the time generate inner upset, and that’s all of the extra true of a good knit, traditionalist business like asset administration. The share value decline for the reason that begin of this yr isn’t even so dangerous whenever you plot it in opposition to the likes of friends Jupiter, Ashmore, Amundi and Schroders.

Hassle is, this isn’t actually in regards to the merger any extra. Everybody accepts consolidation hasn’t spurred the 2 on to larger issues. It’s not nearly this yr’s share value efficiency both: Abrdn’s shares have performed greater than twice as badly as Schroders’ over the previous two years.

It’s about issues with the credibility of the turnround plan. In between discuss of “vectors”, it’s generally onerous to grasp what Fowl’s getting at. Diversification into UK wealth administration is smart; as does growing publicity to funding platform prospects even when valuations have come off their highs. However his incapability to ship a clear-cut technique simply swallowed by the Metropolis is an issue in a enterprise broadly recognised as requiring simplicity after the Normal Life-Aberdeen mash-up.

On high of that mounted prices stay stubbornly excessive (93 per cent of prices within the first half of this yr with barely any employees bonuses), profitability poor and the primary demonstration of Fowl’s strategic perception is to deploy Abrdn’s spare capital on the Interactive Investor acquisition on the high of the market.

Numis analyst David McCann reckons the sum of Abrdn’s elements are value greater than twice its market capitalisation. After stripping out the worth of listed stakes in insurer Phoenix and Indian teams HDFC Life and HDFC Asset Administration, plus “surplus” capital recognized by the corporate in its interim outcomes, Panmure Gordon’s Rae Maile calculates the asset administration enterprise, UK platform operations and UK wealth arm are being valued at about £800mn — and that features the enterprise it spent £1.5bn on lower than a yr in the past.

McCann’s brutal evaluation concludes it’s “value extra lifeless than alive”. That is perhaps true. There may be scope to show it spherical: diversification is all properly and good however finding out the core asset administration engine, nonetheless a multitude from the merger days, is critical too. If Fowl isn’t ready to do this or simply as importantly can’t convey these within the enterprise with him, it appears apparent that another person both ought to, or ought to promote it off.

Maybe Fowl’s drawback is that markets are merely lacking the message. In that case, that isn’t helped by the very fact Abrdn solely updates buyers on efficiency twice a yr.

It appears an excessive amount of to hope for an activist in a struggling sector, with belongings beneath administration prone to decline in a downturn and energetic efficiency underwhelming throughout a sell-off when it ought to shine. Chair Sir Douglas Flint in the meantime is carefully tied to Fowl: his rent, who Flint knew from banking. However boards all the time again bosses, proper up till the purpose they don’t.

Funding managers can rebound — Man Group’s current revival is a living proof. However somebody wants to drag Abrdn again. Proper now, it appears simply as prone to be pulled aside.

[email protected]